The NWO I: Tribalism vs Individualism

We all have been conditioned to believe that race is just skin deep and that everyone is the same on the inside. Anybody who questions this narrative is demonized by the media as hateful, violent, and backwards.  However the key to understanding the New World Order is understanding race and the fact that there are very real differences among the different groups of people.

Global IQ by country

Homicide rates in the US by Race

In 2015, homicide rates were 5.7 deaths per 100,000 for the total population, 20.9 for non-Hispanic blacks, 4.9 for Hispanics, and 2.6 for non-Hispanic whites. (source: cdc.gov)

Median Household Net Worth

Without understanding race you cannot comprehend the full extent to what is going on in today’s world. You cannot understand the reasons behind the numerous conflicts all around us. Thanks to the dumbing down of society through the education system and the media people, particularly in the West, have lost nearly all concept of race. By losing your concept of race you will not only not comprehend the “world order” but you may be contributing and perpetuating the agendas of the world order without knowing it.

Individualism versus Tribalism

Probably the most important aspect of race to understand is that of individualism and tribalism (also known as collectivism or ethnocentricism). People who are tribalistic think as a group. Blacks and the Semitic people such as the Jews and Arabs are tribalistic by nature. Whites by contrast tend to be individualistic.

Tribalism (Collectivism)

  • high levels of racial awareness
  • strong and impermeable ingroup-outgroup barrier
  • sensitive to criticisms of their people
  • often feel an emotional uplift being around people of their own (the emotional behaviors are often seen by outsiders as bizarre)
  • high sense of pride in their people and feelings of superiority
  • highly judgemental

The list above is a generalization. It does not mean that every single member of that group possess all those traits. Generalizations however are important.

People who are tribalistic are cohesive and ethnocentric. They form a tight bond with their people and are very protective of them. They tend to have high regards for people of their own kind and look upon outsiders with suspicion. *Tribal people usually carry an exaggerated sense of victimization and view criticisms of their people and their leaders as an attack. They carry an “us” versus “them” attitude. Collectivists have a strong and impermeable ingroup/outgroup barrier. Group goals are emphasized over personal goals. In tribal societies, strong authoritarian leadership is valued.

(To better understand tribalistic behavior, think about how you would react if one of your own family members were criticized by an outsider. You would likely be offended, right? Even if that outsider was correct in his criticism you would still feel the criticism was an attack. A tribal similarly sees their entire group as one giant family)

Tribalism likely evolved as a defense mechanism against invasion from enemy groups over territory and resources. It was intended to protect the group from outside harm and exploitation. They evolved where the climates were warm and the the population was dense. Because conflicts with neighbors were common, cooperation among peers was of prime importance. There was strength in numbers. In tribalistic societies bonds among fellow people were tight and kinship-based relationships were the norm. Tribalists see themselves as one large family fighting for a common cause.

While most people are probably more comfortable criticizing strangers than their own people, tribalistic people take that to a whole different level. They tend to see faults in others but not in themselves. Tribalistic people have a high level of self-deception. In societies where they are a minority, many of them truly believe they are just like everyone else they reside with and any sort of discrimination against them is baseless. Tribalists have no problem criticizing others but have difficulty tolerating criticisms directed against them.

Blacks

Blacks are a group of people that are highly ethnocentric. Though highly ethnocentric, they have many problems that prevent them from properly protecting their people and organizing efficiently. Their low work-ethic, poor planning skills, and low time-preferences are roadblocks that make it difficult for them to move up the ladder in terms of wealth and power. Blacks commit violent crimes, especially against other blacks, at a high rate. The violence among blacks is high in the inner-cities of America and in sub-Saharan Africa, where inter-tribal hostilities remain elevated to this day.

Blacks are poor savers and fast spenders. Because of their low time-preferences, blacks cannot resist the lure of quick and easy money. They are especially quick to sell out their people for short-term rewards. While whites do sell out (mainly due to their low levels of in-group loyalty), blacks sell out primarily because of their lack of self-control and discipline. They act in the short-term.

Being highly ethnocentric, blacks are very defensive of their people. Those who remember the LA Riots back in 1992 recalled seeing a black motorist, Rodney King, being beaten by four white police officers on TV. Shortly afterwards, blacks collectively went on a destructive rampage of burning and looting businesses across Los Angeles (and other cities) that caused massive damages. Although the people who had their businesses destroyed had nothing to do with the beatings, to the blacks, in their mind, it was justified revenge (against the system) for past injustices. In 1995, when OJ Simpson was acquitted of the murders of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown, blacks across America went euphoric. Justice had finally been served they thought. Even blacks that thought that OJ was guilty of the crimes were happy to see him let go. To them it was payback for all the years they had been disenfranchised and discriminated against. To them, a fellow brother was freed. The white reaction to the verdict by contrast was that of shock and dismay.

Blacks, like many tribal people, are highly judgmental of others. They especially express unfavorable attitudes toward fellow blacks who do not fit group norms and act “too white.” Blacks have preferences in dress code, hair style, and music genres that distinguishes them from non-blacks.

Black Theory

The theory with the blacks, according to Richard Fuerle, who is the author of Erectus Walks Amongst Us, is that because they evolved in a warm climate where their food was available year round they did not need to develop the thinking capacity that people who evolved as hunter-gathers such as the Caucasians and northern Asians required. The Africans simply picked their food from the trees when they were hungry. Hunting by contrast took patience, skill, and careful planning.

Jews

Like blacks Jews are highly ethnocentric. They exhibit similar behavior as the blacks and other tribal people in regards to protecting their people from criticism. As with blacks, Jews get highly defensive and emotional when people outside of their group criticize one of their own. Even criticisms that are not directed towards the Jewish people themselves, such as that of the Israeli government, is seen by many Jews as an attack on their race.

Like blacks, exploitation of the out-group is viewed by Jews as justified and excusable. For example it has been widely known among those in the tourist industry who receive a lot of young Israelis (read Jews) tourists, that they had a reputation for being loud and disrespectful of others. Many hotel and lodge owners in popular resort areas such as in southeast Asia and South America have complained about young Israeli men trashing establishment after they vacate them. (Many hotels have a no Israelis-allowed policy because of this.)

There are major differences between blacks and Jews however. Unlike blacks, Jews excel when it comes to work-ethic and discipline. They place a premium on education and high-investment parenting. Jews are an extremely committed and highly focused group of people. When they set out to make a goal they make sure it gets achieved. Jews have a long-term outlook on life and of their people as a whole. They rarely commit violent acts against fellow Jews. A Jew who cheats or sells out his or her people is viewed with scorn by the Jewish community.

Below is from Kevin MacDonald’s book, the Culture of Critique. Though the second column refers to Jews, many of those characteristics could also apply to other ethnocentric groups.

Individualism

  • low levels of racial awareness
  • weak and permeable ingroup-outgroup barrier
  • relatively high levels of trust towards strangers
  • disposition to using logic and reasoning to draw conclusionsIndividualists have low levels of tribalism and weak in-group attachments. Their trust of strangers are relatively high. European-based people are an example of a group that have high amounts of individualism. European-based people, particularly those from the northern part of the European continent, tend to be self-reliant and have little in the way of “brotherly” attachment to people of their own. They value strong individual rights and democratic forms of government. The in-group/out-group barrier among Caucasians are weak and permeable. Individual, not group-based goals, are paramount.

The relatively high degrees of individualism among European-based people probably stemmed from the way they evolved. It is theorized that they evolved in an environment that was sparsely populated due to the cold winters and they therefore had little contact with outsiders. Dealing with the physical environment was more of a concern than dealing with rival enemy groups. European-based people had to rely on hunting and careful planning of food storage and shelters. Those who were able to achieve this were naturally selected and survived.

The individualism of whites and their ability to think independently is responsible for unleashing high amounts creativity. Perhaps more has come from them in terms of engineering, architecture, literature, the sciences, and the arts than any other group of people. They have also developed a high standard of living across the West because of their independence and their willingness to compete in a market environment against fellow peers to create quality products and services.

The relatively high degrees of individualism among whites is however problematic. They don’t possess the type of protective mechanism that ethnocentric people possess. Whites tend to lack skepticism when it comes to dealing with strangers (and more times than not are willing to cooperate with them). They lack aggression in fending their people off from hostile outsiders, thus making them vulnerable to being exploited. Whites are perhaps more likely than any other group of people to cower in the face of accusations of being a racist. Additionally many whites have no problem supporting deliberately non-white organizations such as Black Lives Matter, the NAACP, and the ACLU. (This attitude is not just problematic to fellow whites but problematic to other people as well. This will be discussed later).

While individualism can lead to increased creativity and outside the box thinking, individualists can easily be lead to do things that sabotage their people’s best interest in exchange for selfish gains. Because of this, individualistic groups such as the whites, would benefit from a system and a leadership designed to prevent their individualism from turning into something that ends up harming their people.

*That is not to say that the Jews, blacks, and Arabs haven’t been victims. The Jews have been persecuted throughout much of their history, having been kicked out country after country. The blacks were brutalized during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and the years after emancipation. The Arabs and their land are currently being destroyed in the War On Terror. 

Leave a Reply